(1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA237307573; Fri, 20 Oct 1995 18:06:13 -0700
Return-Path: <owner-lightwave@mail.webcom.com>
Received: from moscow.com by mail.webcom.com with ESMTP
(1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA237247568; Fri, 20 Oct 1995 18:06:08 -0700
Received: from [199.245.242.129] (bei.moscow.com [199.245.242.129]) by moscow.com (8.6.9/8.6.9) with SMTP id RAA31709 for <lightwave@webcom.com>; Fri, 20 Oct 1995 17:56:39 -0700
Message-Id: <199510210056.RAA31709@moscow.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 1995 18:03:45 -0800
To: lightwave@mail.webcom.com
From: bblevins@moscow.com (Bryan Blevins)
Subject: Re: smoothing
Sender: owner-lightwave@mail.webcom.com
Precedence: bulk
> I'm a little stumpted, and I hope you'll excuse my taking up the
>list's time with such a rudimentary problem--but I can't get a sphere to
>look smooth.
> I've even tried tripling and subdividing, thinking the more
>polygons, the smoother. My sphere was nearly sixty k polygons, and still
>looked like a great geodesic dome.
>
> Obviously I have smoothing turned on, and that's why I'm puzzled
>as to why it doesn't seem to be doing the trick. Could someone clue me in
>as to what sort of max smoothing angle will work?
>
> Thanks.
1. Make sure your not in quickshade mode. (Camera Panel)
2. Are the polygons sharing points? Merge points if you need to.